Sunday, May 31, 2009

Ups and Downs of the Business Cycle

I do not recommend trying to time the market. Once again - I do NOT recommend timing the market. That being said there are benefits to knowing where we are in the business cycle.

From a value perspective what I look for first and foremost is the discount to a company's intrinsic value that their stock is trading at. This card trumps all as the company that leaves you the greatest margin for error should outperform in the long-run. Assuming all else being equal, including the discount to intrinsic value, there are times when I would select one investment over another. Look at today's markets for instance, we are most definitely somewhere around the trough of the business cycle. As the markets begin to improve we can expect a resurgence of inflation as demand returns and rates (which are now at historic lows) revert to the long-run average. At a time like this I would rather hold resource producers that will benefit from commodity price inflation. On the other hand, I would stay away from consumer goods manufacturers who will be susceptible to the rising input prices and may have competitive pressures which will keep them from raising prices to compensate. Financial companies would also perform poorly in an inflationary environment as rates rise and cut into their profits.

As mentioned before, this is only one of the many considerations that would go into comparing one investment option to another. If one company looks like the greater value play and has comparable long term prospects then the short term implications of the business cycle would not play a major part of the decision. This brings me to the next implication for this topic on value investing. When valuing a company it is a good idea to normalize earnings over an entire business cycle. As value investors we take a long term horizon and the value of a company relies in large part on profits that are expected many years into the future. As such, the next few years in the business cycle should not play much importance in the investment decision. It is important to make sure that you don't "anchor" your future expectations on recent boom or bust years. By normalizing profits over an entire business cycle we enable our valuation to take a realistic long-term view of the profits a company can be expected to make without incorporating a bias from the most recent reporting periods. As long term investors we are concerned with the long-term path of the economy and not the short term booms and busts that give rise to great investment opportunities.

Saturday, May 30, 2009

First Post - Recommended Reading

It's pouring rain outside as I sit here and listen to the thunder and the occasional wail of sirens passing by... what better time for my first post! To introduce myself; I am a 25 year old student of value investing and, while I will surely get older and more knowledgeable, I will also always remain a student of this investment philosophy. Having been only formally introduced to value investing within the past year, at MBA school, I am already a devout follower in and believer of the philosophy. During the past year I have read countless journal articles and research papers on value investing - I have even valued a company or two (quite the understatement). The goal of this inaugural post is to start you, the reader, on the path of enlightenment. Following are a list of journal articles and working papers that I recommend you read in order to help you pursue a value investment methodology with the discipline that is required. If you are currently enrolled in a post-secondary institution then you can likely access the journal articles through your school's library. The working papers listed can be found via the Social Science Research Network (SSRN).
  1. Abhyankar, A., Ho, K., Zhao, H., Value versus Growth: Stochastic Dominance Criteria, Working Paper, 2006.
  2. Arshanapalli, B., and Nelson, W.B., Small Cap and Value Investing Offer both High Returns and a Hedge, The Journal of Wealth Management, Spring 2007.
  3. Athanassakos, G., Portfolio Rebalancing and the January Effect in Canada, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 48, No. 6, Nov. – Dec., 1992, pp. 67-78.
  4. Athanassakos, G., Value vs. Growth Stock Returns and the Value Premium: The Canadian Experience 1985-2002, Working Paper, 2006.
  5. Bauman, W.S., and Miller, R.E., Investor Expectations and the Performance of Value Stocks versus Growth Stocks, Journal of Portfolio Management, Spring 1997.
  6. Capaul, C., Rowley, I., Sharpe, W.F., International Value and Growth Stock Returns, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 49, No. 1, Jan. – Feb., 1993, pp. 27-36.
  7. Chan, L.K.C., and Lakonishok, J., Value and Growth Investing: Review and Update, Financial Analysts Journal, January/February 2004.
  8. Fama, E.F., and French, K.R., Value versus Growth: The International Evidence, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 53, No. 6, Dec. 1998, pp. 1975-1999.
  9. Kao, D., and Shumaker, R.D., Equity Style Timing, Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 55, No. 1, Jan. – Feb., 1999, pp. 37-48.
  10. Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 49, No. 5, Dec. 1994, pp. 1541-1578.
Related Posts with Thumbnails
Subscribe via RSS